A coalition of more than 130 charities, including Amnesty International, Oxfam, and Save the Children, is urging the immediate shutdown of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF)—a controversial aid initiative supported by Israel and the U.S. Critics accuse the group’s operations of facilitating violence and exacerbating civilian suffering in Gaza.
Why the Outcry?
- High Human Cost
Since GHF began distributing aid in late May, over 500 Palestinians have been killed and nearly 4,000 injured while attempting to access its four military-controlled distribution points, replacement of hundreds of UN-run centers. - Militarized Zones & Live Fire
NGOs report that areas near GHF sites have become “militarized zones,” where Israeli forces “routinely” fire on civilians in a desperate rush for food. The UN calls such tactics a possible war crime under international law. - Humanitarian Standards Violated
The joint NGO statement accuses GHF of breaching core humanitarian principles: neutrality, impartiality, and independence. Forcing Gazans into fenced aid zones under armed guard is deemed dangerous and unethical.
A Troubled Alternative to UN Aid
- GHF’s Structure: Operated by private firms (e.g., Safe Reach Solutions) and guarded by armed contractors under Israeli patrols, the GHF was launched as a purported alternative to UN-controlled deliveries, amid Israeli claims of Hamas interference.
- UN & Aid Agencies Refuse Cooperation: Distributing aid under conditions where civilians face risk has prompted UN and humanitarians to reject involvement.
- Spiking Casualties: BBC and Al Jazeera documented chaotic, violent scenes—projectiles, gunfire, and deaths—at GHF sites, including 27 reported killed one day in June.
International Voices Raise Alarm
- UN Rights Office states the “weaponization” of food aid is a “potential war crime” as distribution sites turn into traps for starving civilians.
- Fifteen rights organizations, such as the Center for Constitutional Rights and Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, issued appeals to halt GHF’s operations over fears of genocidal outcomes.
- UN Secretary-General António Guterres described the system as “inherently unsafe” and failing basic humanitarian standards
Israeli and U.S. Defenses
- Israel denies deliberate targeting of civilians and says it is reviewing incidents—vowing to install fencing and signage to better manage distribution zones.
- The U.S. State Department claims GHF’s efforts are “successful in getting aid to Gazans” and dismisses criticism as a stylistic matter
Summary Snapshot
| Issue | Details |
|---|---|
| Casualties | Over 500 killed, ~4,000 injured at GHF sites |
| Humanitarian Breaches | Militarized aid zones violate neutrality |
| Global Pushback | 130+ NGOs & UN rights bodies demand shutdown |
| Authorities’ Position | Israel & U.S. defend GHF, allege progress made |
Final Analysis
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation was conceived as an expedient solution to Gaza’s famine threat amid Israel’s UN aid blockade. Yet within weeks, it transformed into a lightning rod for humanitarian outrage. With mounting evidence of civilian harm, calls to shut it down reflect broader concerns about militarized relief and the principles safeguarding humanitarian missions.
Plan Your Trip With Epic Click Travel & Tourism 
Ready to book your travel getaway? Let Epic Click Travel & Tourism curate your journey — from flights and hotels to exclusive airport perks like fast-track check-in and chauffeur transfers.
Visit us: Office 2705, Silver Tower – Marasi Dr – Business Bay – Dubai
Call us: 4 572 6638 | 052 427 5718
Book online: epicclicktravel.com
Email: info@epicclicktravel.com
Follow us for travel inspiration: Epicclick_travel
